2024-09-09 – No Contact Order Filed
📄 2024-09-09 – No Contact Order Filed
I needed protection from ongoing abuse and surveillance. This was my effort to restore a sense of peace.
After months of surveillance, tracking, and emotional manipulation, Dana Wilson filed for a Plenary Order of Protection against her ex-husband, Charles Wilson. Despite providing extensive evidence—including admissions of illegal tracking through Tesla, deceptive manipulation of family account settings, and coordinated false police reports—Dana was instead granted a Reciprocal No Contact Order rather than the full protection she sought.
The order restricted communication strictly to co-parenting matters via the Our Family Wizard app and forbade stalking, electronic intrusion, and account tampering. However, the process left Dana disillusioned. Her attorney, despite being paid in full, failed to fully represent the depth of danger, included misleading messages in court exhibits, and later refused to support Dana’s efforts to enforce the order when Charles violated it repeatedly.
RECIPROCAL NO-CONTACT ORDER
THIS MATTER comes before the Court for hearing on Petitioner Dana Wilson's Petition for a Plenary Order of Protection (2024 OP 1772), the Court being fully advised, finds and orders as follows:
1. The parties shall have no communication with one another, except for any communication involving their minor children. Communication involving the minor children is limited to essential matters, such as the children's health, education, activities/events, financial issues involving the children, and coordinating exchanges and dates for periods of parenting time.
2. Communication shall only take place via the parenting application Our Family Wizard. Both parties shall create an OFW account no later than Thursday, September 12, 2024. Both parties will send confirmation to Dana's counsel that they have activated their account.
3. The parties shall not use any method, electronic or otherwise, to stalk or locate the other party.
4. The parties shall not log in to any of the other parties' accounts (bank accounts, social media accounts, etc.).
5. The parties shall stay at least 25 feet away from each other at any school or child-related event.
6. A violation of this Order may constitute contempt of this Court.
2024-09-03 Email to Betsy Blakeman
from: Dana Wilson <wilsondanar@gmail.com>
to: Betsy Blakeman <bblakeman@feldman-wasser.com>
date: Sep 3, 2024, 11:10 PM
subject: Re: Court Date
mailed-by: gmail.com
Dear Betsy,
I wanted to provide you with key examples that can be presented to the judge on Thursday in support of the Order of Protection. I can pull more information if needed, but these examples should offer enough evidence to demonstrate the necessity of the order.
Tracking and Monitoring Behavior:
1. Date/Time: April 24, 2024
Main Activity/Behavior: Charles used geo-fencing in the Tesla app to track my location, despite being asked not to do so.
Why it validates the order of protection: This demonstrates a clear violation of my privacy and boundaries, showing that Charles was monitoring my whereabouts without consent.
2. Date/Time: April 24, 2024
Main Activity/Behavior: Charles went to the airport, falsely reported my behavior to the authorities (claiming I was in danger), and sent the police and EMTs after me.
Why it validates the order of protection: This action shows that Charles not only tracked me but also escalated the situation by making a false report to law enforcement, endangering my wellbeing.
3. Date/Time: May 23, 2024
Main Activity/Behavior: Charles admitted to using the Tesla app to track my car again, checking its location when I was headed to the airport. He later deleted the app after I became upset.
Why it validates the order of protection: Charles acknowledges his inappropriate tracking of my movements and expresses guilt, confirming the behavior.
4. Date/Time: August 3, 2024
Main Activity/Behavior: I discovered that Charles had set up a family share account under our son Henry’s name, associated with the email crwwilsoncrw@gmail.com. The account was created for Henry and Charles on March 10, 2023, and I was added to the account on January 23, 2024. Location sharing was enabled, and I was unable to remove myself from the account without Charles’s intervention.
Why it validates the order of protection: Although Charles eventually assisted in removing the family shared account, he had previously assured me multiple times that all shared accounts and tracking had been deactivated. Setting up this account under our son’s name and linking it to both our phones demonstrates manipulation. Additionally, on the same day, after the family account was turned off, Charles attempted to convince me to adjust SMS settings on my phone, claiming he wasn’t receiving my text messages. This further supports the claim of ongoing attempts to monitor my communications and movements.
Emotional Strain and Manipulative Behavior:
1. Date/Time: July 10, 2024
Main Activity/Behavior: Charles accused me of running away from home and not telling him about my past, including rehab and working in adult entertainment. I responded by correcting his statements and explaining my need for space.
Why it validates the order of protection: These messages illustrate how Charles attempts to make me feel guilty by twisting facts and past incidents, contributing to emotional stress.
2. Date/Time: July 11, 2024, 1:16 PM
Main Activity/Behavior: Charles implied that my decision to sell the Tesla was based on wanting to escape his tracking behavior, rather than my own decisions.
Why it validates the order of protection: This demonstrates Charles's attempt to control me by framing my decisions as reactions to his own actions, adding emotional strain.
3. Date/Time: July 16, 2024, 9:07 AM
Main Activity/Behavior: Charles sent a message stating his willingness to have his devices checked and denied ever contracting anyone to harm or track me.
Why it validates the order of protection: Despite previous behaviors and suspicions, Charles publicly denies tracking or harming me, which adds to my emotional strain by invalidating my concerns.
