2025-02-10 – Incident Report on SUV
📄 2025-02-10 – Incident Report on SUV
My security camera captured proof of a stalking vehicle. I turned over evidence. Still dismissed.
On February 10, 2025, Dana Wilson’s Xfinity security cameras captured a maroon SUV circling her home, parking directly behind her, and waiting two minutes before the white male driver asked if “Rachel” lived there—Dana’s middle name. This suspicious timing aligned exactly with Dana exiting her home, suggesting she was being tracked. The driver confirmed her address, adding to the intimidation. Dana turned over detailed footage to police, but the officer declined to investigate further or capture the license plate.
Despite Dana’s history of being stalked, tracked, and digitally harassed—including previous cross-state incidents tied to her ex-husband Charles Wilson—this event was again dismissed. Her attempts to report linked identity theft, false public associations with criminals, and manipulated records in databases like Intelius have gone unanswered. The ongoing surveillance, coupled with manipulated identities and court order violations, continues without protection or justice.
2025-02-10 2025-00001216 Incident Report Suspicious Vehicle – Xfinity Home Security documents maroon SUV
Incident Overview
On February 10, 2025, at approximately 4:53 PM, Dana Wilson’s Xfinity Home Security cameras captured footage of a red/maroon SUV stopping in front of her residence.
The vehicle paused for about a minute before driving further into the neighborhood.
Shortly after, the vehicle returned from the opposite direction, parked behind Dana as she locked her front door, and remained stationary for two minutes before speaking.
A white male driver inside the SUV asked if "Rachel" (which happens to be Dana’s middle name) lived at the residence.
The driver then confirmed Dana’s address and asked again about "Rachel."
Dana informed the driver that no one by that name lived there, after which the SUV drove away.
Suspicious Patterns and Harassment Indicators
The timing of the vehicle's arrival and behavior suggests potential electronic surveillance or tracking:
Dana rarely leaves her house (only a few times per week), yet the vehicle appeared just after Dana pulled her vehicle out of the garage and shut the garage door returning inside the home.
The SUV circled the area and returned from the neighborhood to stop directly behind her as she was locking her front door, making it impossible for her to see their approach.
The driver waited two full minutes watching her before initiating any interaction.
The request for "Rachel"—a name closely linked to Dana—raises concerns about intentional intimidation or the use of false identities to probe for responses.
This incident mirrors previous experiences of harassment, stalking, and tracking, including:
Unwanted surveillance and tracking by Charles Wilson, Dana’s ex-husband.
Manipulation of digital devices, such as unauthorized access to security cameras or phone location data.
Repeated encounters with individuals asking misleading or false questions as a potential intimidation tactic.
Additional Context and Related Incidents
Dana has previously experienced electronic tampering and identity manipulation:
False online records associating her with known criminals (such as Oronde Hardy) through Intelius-People Finder.
Suspicious linkages of her identity to individuals and addresses she has never associated with in Texas, Kentucky, and Illinois.
Unauthorized addresses and phone numbers linked to her identity, indicating possible use of fraud or identity theft.
In a separate stalking incident (April 24, 2024), Charles Wilson tracked Dana’s vehicle across state lines to an airport, then called emergency services under false pretenses, falsely claiming she was unresponsive in a parked Tesla.
Charles has a pattern of electronic monitoring, including:
Using vehicle tracking applications (Tesla app, Xfinity, and geofencing alerts).
Making false emergency reports to law enforcement to instigate official intervention.
Attempting to control Dana’s online presence, legal identity, and movements by manipulating records.
Relevance to the Court Case (Breach of No Contact Order)
This incident directly supports claims of ongoing harassment, electronic surveillance, and intimidation tactics. It also reinforces patterns of tracking and psychological manipulation linked to Charles Wilson:
1. Electronic Monitoring & Surveillance:
o The SUV’s arrival right after Dana pulls her vehicle outside suggests real-time surveillance or tracking.
o The questioning about "Rachel" (very close to her middle name) is too specific to be a coincidence.
o The SUV circling the neighborhood and observing her before engaging is a common tactic used in intimidation and stalking.
2. Pattern of Stalking & Psychological Manipulation:
o Charles has a documented history of showing up uninvited, tracking Dana’s locations, and using false pretenses to create distress.
o His previous actions—such as tracking her to the airport—show a clear intent to monitor and control her movements.
o The deliberate questioning by an unknown individual is consistent with previous gaslighting and intimidation tactics.
3. Breach of the Reciprocal No Contact Order:
o While the driver was unidentified, the behavior aligns with previous harassment linked to Charles Wilson and his network.
o The use of tracking, false narratives, and intimidation violates legal protections put in place to prevent ongoing harm.
o The manipulation of digital records and identity fraud (such as linking Dana to criminals) furthers the pattern of stalking and harm.