2024-12-14 – Two Incident Reports for Calls
📄 2024-12-14 – Two Incident Reports for Calls
Despite court protection, I was still harassed. Two reports filed. Still no meaningful protection.
Despite a court-issued Reciprocal No Contact Order, harassment continued. On December 13, 2024, Charles Wilson violated the order by appearing at Dana’s home to deliver an Amazon package—an Epson printer that wasn’t due until December 18. Dana had separately arranged to purchase a printer from Best Buy, raising concerns about how Charles knew her updated plans.
Dana also discovered her personal planner missing after visiting the Bloom Building—this planner contained sensitive login credentials and private notes, sparking fears of data breaches and surveillance.
Though two incident reports were created, police declined to file an official violation report. Officer Muncy stated enforcement must come from the court and recommended Dana change her passwords. He also referred her to a local domestic violence center for help.
Core Issues:
❌ Violation of No Contact Order with an in-person delivery and potential tracking.
❌ Missing planner containing confidential information.
❌ Police refusal to formally document the incident or take investigative action.
❌ Inadequate support from the legal system, despite clear threats to safety and privacy.
Dana continues to advocate for her protection while navigating institutional indifference and ongoing surveillance.
2024-12-14 2024-000011259 and 2024-000011282 Incident Report – Phone Call – Report Violation of No Contact Order
Summary of Incident: December 14, 2024 – No-Contact Order Violation and Missing Planner (Incident Report 2024-000011259 and 2024-000011282)
Location: 1 Kirkwood Street, Chatham, IL
Summary:
Dana Wilson formally reported a violation of the Reciprocal No-Contact Order issued on September 9, 2024, between herself and her ex-husband, Charles Wilson.
On December 13, 2024, Charles Wilson arrived at her residence and delivered an Epson printer package from Amazon, despite the delivery being listed for December 18, 2024. Dana had made separate plans to pick up another printer from Best Buy in Brentwood due to the delay, raising concerns about how Charles knew about her updated plans.
This unexpected visit was interpreted as an attempt to track Dana’s activities and circumvent the No-Contact Order, which prohibits contact, account access, and tracking.
Dana reported this incident via phone and requested a formal police report to document the violation and to seek guidance on enforcing the order.
Concerns Raised by Dana:
1. Violation of Court Order: Charles' appearance at her residence and interaction with her constitutes direct contact and raises concerns about potential tracking and foreknowledge of her plans.
2. Missing Personal Planner: Dana also reported that her personal planner, containing sensitive information such as computer passwords, went missing during a recent trip to the Bloom Building. She expressed concerns about potential unauthorized access to her accounts due to the lost planner.
3. Police Response: Officer Logan Muncy responded via email, stating that:
o No police report would be generated for the No-Contact Order violation, as enforcement must come from the court.
o The missing planner incident would need to be reported to the agency with jurisdiction over the Bloom Building.
o Officer Muncy recommended that Dana change her passwords to prevent potential data breaches.
Follow-Up Actions and Recommendations by Officer Muncy:
Suggested contacting Sojourn, a local domestic violence center, for support in navigating the legal process and obtaining court advocates.
Provided the incident report numbers and advised Dana to file any FOIA requests for incident documentation if needed.
Concerns:
Lack of Documentation: The police declined to file a formal report on the violation, leaving Dana without an official record of the incident.
Court Enforcement Issues: Dana expressed frustration with the challenges in enforcing the No-Contact Order and obtaining adequate protection.
Data Breach Risk: The loss of the planner, coupled with concerns about tracking and data breaches, heightened Dana’s sense of vulnerability and the need for stronger protective measures.
This incident reflects Dana’s ongoing concerns about security breaches, inadequate enforcement of court orders, and potential data compromise due to unauthorized access to her personal information.
2024-12-14 2024-000011259 and 2024-000011282 Incident Report – Phone Call – Report Violation of No Contact Order
Summary of Incident: December 14, 2024 – No-Contact Order Violation and Missing Planner (Incident Report 2024-000011259 and 2024-000011282)
Location: 1 Kirkwood Street, Chatham, IL
Summary:
Dana Wilson formally reported a violation of the Reciprocal No-Contact Order issued on September 9, 2024, between herself and her ex-husband, Charles Wilson.
On December 13, 2024, Charles Wilson arrived at her residence and delivered an Epson printer package from Amazon, despite the delivery being listed for December 18, 2024. Dana had made separate plans to pick up another printer from Best Buy in Brentwood due to the delay, raising concerns about how Charles knew about her updated plans.
This unexpected visit was interpreted as an attempt to track Dana’s activities and circumvent the No-Contact Order, which prohibits contact, account access, and tracking.
Dana reported this incident via phone and requested a formal police report to document the violation and to seek guidance on enforcing the order.
Concerns Raised by Dana:
1. Violation of Court Order: Charles' appearance at her residence and interaction with her constitutes direct contact and raises concerns about potential tracking and foreknowledge of her plans.
2. Missing Personal Planner: Dana also reported that her personal planner, containing sensitive information such as computer passwords, went missing during a recent trip to the Bloom Building. She expressed concerns about potential unauthorized access to her accounts due to the lost planner.
3. Police Response: Officer Logan Muncy responded via email, stating that:
o No police report would be generated for the No-Contact Order violation, as enforcement must come from the court.
o The missing planner incident would need to be reported to the agency with jurisdiction over the Bloom Building.
o Officer Muncy recommended that Dana change her passwords to prevent potential data breaches.
Follow-Up Actions and Recommendations by Officer Muncy:
Suggested contacting Sojourn, a local domestic violence center, for support in navigating the legal process and obtaining court advocates.
Provided the incident report numbers and advised Dana to file any FOIA requests for incident documentation if needed.
Concerns:
Lack of Documentation: The police declined to file a formal report on the violation, leaving Dana without an official record of the incident.
Court Enforcement Issues: Dana expressed frustration with the challenges in enforcing the No-Contact Order and obtaining adequate protection.
Data Breach Risk: The loss of the planner, coupled with concerns about tracking and data breaches, heightened Dana’s sense of vulnerability and the need for stronger protective measures.
This incident reflects Dana’s ongoing concerns about security breaches, inadequate enforcement of court orders, and potential data compromise due to unauthorized access to her personal information.
